Posted by James MacAonghus on July 06, 2009 at 15:08 in Advertising, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
A couple of highlights from Google's recent presentation in China:

I know these statistics don't mean much in practical terms, but Xu Jing Lei has 238M readers!
Posted by James MacAonghus on June 17, 2009 at 13:09 in International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted by James MacAonghus on June 01, 2009 at 16:43 in International (non-US), Videos | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google and Royal Mail have launched Marketing Donut, a marketing website for small businesses. It is the kind of website that you would expect from Royal Mail, which has done little online that is worth mentioning.
But it is a mediocre website by Google's standards, and undermines Google's sales proposition. Google's success with businesses comes from making money for them, not from more intangible services such as marketing. Small businesses want sales much more than they want research, or customer service, or prodcutivity. Google has long been consistent in positioning itself as a sales generator. Schmidt has said that AdWords budgets should come from sales departments, not marketing departments. Marketing Donut, however, is merely a collection of 'helpful tips' about advertising, customer care, market research and other soft business topics.
The main sales section includes banalities such as "Sales bring in the money that enables your business to survive and grow - they are vital elements of marketing". The sales generation section is almost the opposite of what Google should be advocating: "Simple lead generation usually starts with desk research and you might find sales leads in directories (on- and offline), or by buying a targeted mailing list".
The main advertising section states:
There are several ways to advertise on the internet. You can pay for website advertising with a price based on the number of times the ad is displayed. So the more viewers see your ad (or at least the page on which your ad is shown) the more you pay. This simple form of payment might suit you if the aim of your internet advertising is to build brand exposure. It's often referred to as CPM - cost per thousand (with M being the roman numeral for 1,000).
Other alternatives take advantage of the interactive nature of the internet. If you advertise online with the aim of increasing website traffic, then pay per click advertising (PPC) is ideal. You only pay for the viewers who actually click on the ad and come to your site.
Taking this a step further, sometimes advertising on the internet is charged for on a cost per action (CPA) basis. For example, you might be able to negotiate an agreement where you only pay for the number of viewers who actually buy your product as the result of an ad. This kind of payment scheme requires a close relationship with the website where your ad is published, and is typically part of an affiliate marketing relationship.
Perhaps Google decided to stand back and allow a neutral point of view in the writing. But "If you advertise online with the aim of increasing website
traffic, then pay per click advertising (PPC) is ideal" undermines the whole point of AdWords. AdWords is meant to generate sales, not traffic. True, that often does not happen, and Google's rejection of CPA emphasises the fact, but Google should be the last company to admit that.
Posted by James MacAonghus on May 02, 2009 at 15:58 in Distribution, Enterprise, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (2)
Google takes the cup at the Inaugural Google AU vs. Mindshare Table Tennis Championship. One of the informal ways in which Google manages agency relationships. Mindshare is part of WPP.
Posted by James MacAonghus on April 26, 2009 at 20:14 in Advertising, Competitors, Employees, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
This article from the FT is a good profile of Lars Bak, the man who wrote Chrome (as far as such a publicity-shy man can be profiled):
Chrome was a major product whose existence was long suspected, was much
hoped for by many people, and much dreaded by many others. Google deserves credit for ensuring that Chrome remained a secret until its launch, and the type of person that Lars Bak is played a part in that.
Posted by James MacAonghus on April 06, 2009 at 16:31 in International (non-US), Products | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google France blogged about ChercheNet. But aside from some minor details, the initiative is actually two years old. It is part of a broader set of initiatives including Google and Calysto. There is some interesting commentary on this French blog. Nothing much very exciting can be happening in Google France if they blog about old initiatives that have made little progress.
Posted by James MacAonghus on April 05, 2009 at 21:12 in International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google has finished digitising a major chunk of Bodleian Library books. This has been a low profile announcement. With Google facing revenue pressures, monopoly issues, redundancies, privacy problems and perhaps losing some of its magic among some people, it is easy to forget how amazing a feat it is to have one of the world's best libraries digitised. And in an age when we are inundated with millions of snippets of banal information, it is amazing that we take such an important corpus of knowledge for granted. I am as aware as anyone of the harsh side of Google, but in this case, I can only say thank you.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 31, 2009 at 23:15 in International (non-US), Products | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is interesting data on how much of each search engine's traffic comes from "search bar". It is not clear what that means, but seems to be everything except the search engine's website. One caveat though, which has not been pointed out elsewhere: this is data for France (hence the prominence of Orange, Alice, Free) etc.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 27, 2009 at 15:54 in Distribution, International (non-US), Products | Permalink | Comments (0)
Two of the headlines welcoming Adriana Noreña, the new boss of Google for Argentina, Chile and Colombia:
The articles are both complimentary of Noreña. It just struck me that Noreña being a woman is worthy of the headlines. Other local female CEOs mentioned include Sandra Yachelini, head of Microsoft and Analia Remedi, head of HP. At the same time, a study from Grant Thornton International shows that 47% of companies in Arentina have no women in managerial roles.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 23, 2009 at 22:42 in Employees, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
Here is Google's submission to the ISP Code of Practice consultation in New Zealand. Some excerpts:
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 18, 2009 at 17:11 in International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 17, 2009 at 09:47 in Geo, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Google Operating System blog has put together an interesting list of Google's market share in various countries.
The broad trend is that Google is weak in Asia. Not that Sukhinder Cassidy has much of a role in driving Google's search market share in Asia, but it is unlikely to do her any favours in getting Armstrong's job.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 17, 2009 at 03:47 in Advertising, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google is setting up an Android development team in Taiwan, ostensibly because HTC is based in Taiwan. So is Asus, which can't do any harm to the possibility of Android on netbooks. But the myriad of handset manufacturers who must surely be clamouring to develop Android handsets (how else will Android overtake the iPhone by 2012?) may feel left out.
And to what extent did Google base this team in Taiwan because that is where the best mobile talent was? Google's expansion in London was supposed to be attracting the world's best mobile developers (even if that was for mobile as opposed to Android). Of course, good mobile developers can exist in both countries, but the Taiwan recruitment (particularly if it is anything more than a support team for HTC) may make the London developers feel that little bit unloved.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 11, 2009 at 09:53 in International (non-US), Mobile | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google wrote last week about enabling ecommerce websites to deal cross-border with automatic translation. From some parts of Google, including product management, this could be little more than a long-held pipe dream. However, the comments came from the public policy team, who have a lot of clout, and who have taken the time to talk about a little-mentioned goal, when they are already busy with privacy, political party lobbying, anti-Microsoft campaigns, promoting hosted services, discussing spectrum issues and so on. The European public policy team has continued to hire in Europe even as the rest of Google's recruitment has ground to a halt, and cross-border ecommerce seems to be one of its new projects.
Automatic ecommerce website translation is still years away, but should be added to any long-term Google product roadmap monitoring. The comments also serve as a reminder that the original purpose behind hiring machine translation genius Franz Och, that of replicating all web content across all languages, remains valid
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 09, 2009 at 19:42 in International (non-US), Products | Permalink | Comments (0)
Google is supporting the new Working Capital project from Telecom Italia, which will fund and support startups in Italy. Google has allowed Telecom Italia to use Google's brand aesthetics and to use the Google story (Larry, Sergey, Stanford) as inspiration for Italian startups. Google wrote about the campaign in its own blog.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 09, 2009 at 15:37 in Innovation, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)
The selection of YouTube Orchestra members from around the world has been supported by a global PR campaign which I think is a first for Google. Versions of the same story ("local man chosen for YouTube Orchestra") have appeared in countries around the world (for example Poland, China, Bermuda, the UK, Australia, the Netherlands, Canada, Colombia, Spain, Mexico and South Korea) and at a local level in the US (for example Washington, Kansas, Minnesota, Ohio, South Dakota and Oregon).
This is unlikely to be a coincidence - instead it represents a well synchronized effort from Google.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 08, 2009 at 21:11 in International (non-US), Video products | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Economist has written about Google in Asia, something that gets little attention normally (the same applies to Yahoo! in Asia). Naver beats Google in South Korea by at least the same margin as Google beats Microsoft in the US, so we should apply to the same level of expectation to Google's chances of success in South Korea as we do Microsoft's in the US. Like Microsoft, Google has been trying for a long time, through innovation, copying and most recently acquisition, to gain market share, and has failed.
Incidentally, Naver's plans to expand to the US are a non-event. Not only is the Asia-to-US transition always difficult, but NHN tried a similar thing in 2005 and failed. The mediocre performance of Yahoo! Answers also suggests that Naver's answers service would not resonate in the US.
Posted by James MacAonghus on March 04, 2009 at 12:11 in Competitors, International (non-US) | Permalink | Comments (0)